Lobel alludes to the fresh emails ?, ? and ? as crucial comparative characters to have his matchmaking

First of all captures the interest ‘s the comparatively slim and you can tall way the latest characters is actually authored. The newest lines of one’s ?, like, are quick one in-line ten Roberts checks out an effective ? unlike an ?. In spite of the uncial handwriting, the ? is not created such as for example a capital Latin “M”, but rather is comparable to a couple of surrounding “1”s for the Latin cursive; this new crossbar of one’s ? is within the higher 3rd out-of the brand new letter. The new ?, such as the ?, is quite peculiar and you can represents an effective Latin “V”, since ? represents an upside down “V”; plain old expansion of your best diagonal to reach the top kept doesn’t happen. The ? consists of two separate pieces. There can be an evident gap amongst the straight downstroke in addition to several diagonals, which can be drawn in one brush Irak gelinleri. This kind of this new ? can be obtained, such as, during the an excellent psalm fragment on the earliest 1 / 2 of the fresh 8th century, P.Amst. I 21 14 . The crossbar of the ? written high up is even utilized in a beneficial liturgical calendar on seasons 535/6, the fresh P.Oxy. 1357 16 . The form of this new ? thereon papyrus plus is much like the newest setting utilized in P.Ryl. III 470. The new ? within papyrus, although not, weighed against P.Ryl. III 470, is written as a continuing page. Brand new ? inside the P.Oxy. 1357 has an excellent diagonal coronary arrest to the top kept, through the fragment P.Ryl. III 470 it’s written for example good triangle. The brand new previously mentioned variety of new ?, a similar form of the ?, the above-said version of the latest ? and you can an ? with similarly brief strokes are also available into the P.Berol 13269, which is allotted to the fresh new seventh/eighth Century 16 . P.Lond. 1817, old from the 6th century, nevertheless alternates involving the uncial as well as the above-said sorts of the newest ?, and you can similarities with the Manchester fragment are present with regard to the ? and ?, given that pit between the two components of the latest ? inside P. Lond. 1817 isn’t as higher as with P.Ryl. III 470 17 . According to research by the comparative texts quoted, P.Ryl. III, 470 belongs amongst the 6th and you may seventh ages. Brand new fifth century is impractical since big date from source, however, can’t be entirely eliminated. Employing brown ink, from which there is no facts prior to the fourth century, in addition to factors contained in this advice 18 .

Basically it can be asserted that a dating with the third otherwise last century must be thought to be really not likely

13. In the ends of your own shots off ?, ?, ?, ?, and you may ? is brief specks of ink that provides the text an artificial, or, because the Lobel place it, attractive looks. For a comparable experience within the enchanting messages, cf. p. seven col. 17; pt 10; p. thirty-six col. 2; P. thirty-six Col. 7 inside: K. Klassendanz, Papyri Graecae Magicae. Perish griechischen Zauberpapyri (=The fresh Greek Enchanting Papyri) II, Stuttgart 2nd ed. 1974.

In terms of paleographic matchmaking, it must be noted you to definitely majuscule manuscripts, as Roberts themselves produces in his feedback, are very hard to day

18. I’m with debt in order to H. Harrauer to your talk. Select plus V. Gardthausen, Griechische Palaographie step 1: Das Buchwesen i will be Altertum und auch i’m byzantinischen Mittelalter, Leipzig 2nd ed. 1911, 203-217. He writes (p.205) you to inside the fifth century Ad “a brown, plus metal ink arrived to have fun with” and you will rates Schubart within this framework when you look at the note 5 towards the same web page, exactly who speaks of a brown-red-ink , that is available about papyri regarding the last century Ad. At the same time, the greater worthwhile brownish ink was only used in important texts.